-
周波:過度自信的美國很危險,缺乏自信的美國更危險
最后更新: 2020-07-29 19:03:13Why China must beware a less confident US, politically divided and pessimistic about its future
Has China’s foreign policy restraint ended? This is the question raised by Kurt M. Campbell and Mira Rapp-Hooper in their essay “China is done biding its time” in Foreign Affairs. They argue that since the pandemic first engulfed the world, China’s government has engaged in an unprecedented diplomatic offensive, taking advantage of the ensuing chaos and the global power vacuum left by a no-show US administration.
Likewise, in a recent opinion piece in the Financial Times, Michele Flournoy, a former US undersecretary of defence for policy, concludes that China’s border clash with India is another sign of the county’s growing assertiveness.
Such views, preponderant in Western media, need serious examination. China’s “assertiveness”, be it in the South China Sea or the Galwan Valley, is a response to the challenges it perceives to its sovereignty. And China doesn’t need to make use of the “chance” provided by the pandemic since China is stronger than these countries militarily.
In Hong Kong, where the “one country, two system” framework applies, “one country” comes first, and “two systems” doesn’t mean the central government should tolerate the unrest that has plagued the city in recent years. The national security law is an “enough is enough” response.
While it is debatable whether the US has declined in power, most people agree at least that the US has declined relative to other nations, such as the new emerging economies. But Donald Trump is the biggest proponent of the “decline” narrative. His sketch of “American carnage” and then championing of “America first” helped him win the presidential election in 2016.
Democrat presidential hopeful Joe Biden and former national security adviser John Bolton called Trump “an aberration”, but he surely isn’t one if he is re-elected in November. This president, who engaged in aberrant behaviour on a daily basis, would then look more like the culmination of long-standing trends in a country that is politically divided and broadly pessimistic about its future.
Even if the US is in retreat, Beijing has more serious business to attend to than confront Washington, most importantly the “great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation” by 2049. Thus, even if the Chinese government decided against setting a gross domestic product target for 2020 due to the pandemic, it hasn’t relented on its commitment to eliminate extreme poverty by the end of this year.
It is particularly ludicrous to hear Washington describe Beijing as “assertive” or “coercive”. In a telephone conversation with Trump in 2019, former US president Jimmy Carter referred to the US as “the most warlike nation in the history of the world” and said the US has been at peace for only 16 of its 242 years as a nation. Professor Michael Lind pointed out in The National Interest in 2019 that “the US is now engaged in more simultaneous small wars on more fronts than at any point in its history”.
In comparison, China has had no wars since 1979. The deadly brawl in the Galwan Valley is most unfortunate; still, soldiers from both sides had a tacit understanding of not shooting at each other.
American policies towards China have been based on narcissism (“We rebuilt China over the last 25 years”, remarked US Vice-President Michael Pence) and hallucination (the US Strategic Approach to China noted that China’s “rapid economic development and engagement with the world did not lead to convergence with the citizen-centric, free and open order as the United States had hoped”).
Beijing should never have misled Washington in this regard – stability in its political system and society has always been China’s core interest.
An overconfident US after the Cold War has proved dangerous. The US’ war in Afghanistan alone killed tens of thousands of people, including more than 2,300 American troops. But a less confident US is probably more dangerous. Washington has finally dropped its mask and is making all its resources available to maintain its primacy and suppress China.
This is clear in the US’ bills on Taiwan, its change of policy of not taking sides on the South China Sea issue and calls to allies and partners to band together with Washington against Beijing. The US’ efforts around the world against Chinese telecom company Huawei are not really because Huawei’s 5G network is a “Trojan horse” of Chinese intelligence services, as US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo asserted, but that if Huawei’s 5G system is widely adopted, the US might lose its supremacy in communication technology to China.
How could China continue to develop peacefully amid these headwinds? The Chinese government believes that while the world is experiencing profound changes “unprecedented in a century”, this is also the “best time for China’s development since modern times”. The most profound change the world is experiencing is China growing ever stronger.
In the Asia-Pacific, China’s neighbours fear being pushed to take sides by either China or the US. During an Asian tour in August last year, US Defence Secretary Mark T. Esper said the Pentagon would like to deploy intermediate-range American missiles in Asia within months. Some Association of South Asian Nations members might wish the US could balance China, but never at a cost of turning the South China Sea into a battlefield on their doorsteps.
Neither Beijing nor Washington wants a conflict. But should a conflict occur between them, it will occur in the Western Pacific, not in the waters off Hawaii or continental USA. The People’s Liberation Army thus at least enjoys the convenience of geography. There is no guarantee that the US military will prevail. War games conducted by Rand showed that the US could very well lose a war to China.
At the 74th session of the UN General Assembly last year, UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres warned against a “great fracture” – the world splitting in two with the two largest economies creating separate and competing worlds. Sadly, this looks more real than ever.
本文系觀察者網(wǎng)獨家稿件,文章內(nèi)容純屬作者個人觀點,不代表平臺觀點,未經(jīng)授權(quán),不得轉(zhuǎn)載,否則將追究法律責(zé)任。關(guān)注觀察者網(wǎng)微信guanchacn,每日閱讀趣味文章。
-
本文僅代表作者個人觀點。
- 責(zé)任編輯: 楊晗軼 
-
CNN這個報道一出,才發(fā)現(xiàn)中國戰(zhàn)機真夠拼的!
2020-07-29 18:37 中日關(guān)系 -
津巴布韋農(nóng)業(yè)部長去世,非媒:因感染新冠
2020-07-29 18:16 新冠肺炎抗疫戰(zhàn) -
中國用Tiktok干涉美國大選?外交部:不感興趣
2020-07-29 17:56 美國政治 -
日本單日新增確診首超1000例
2020-07-29 17:46 新冠肺炎抗疫戰(zhàn) -
“六眼聯(lián)盟”?日本又表態(tài)了
2020-07-29 17:14 -
拜登不小心泄露大選機密?
2020-07-29 17:10 美國大選2020 -
這幾個美國議員又聲稱“中國可能利用TikTok干預(yù)大選”
2020-07-29 16:14 美國一夢 -
不愿接受強制病毒檢測,聯(lián)邦快遞飛行員想停飛香港
2020-07-29 15:54 香港 -
車頂行李箱變出倆大活人 英國游客傻眼了
2020-07-29 15:48 觀網(wǎng)看片 -
澳美發(fā)表聯(lián)合聲明無端指責(zé)攻擊中國 中方駁斥
2020-07-29 15:30 中國外交 -
特朗普侄女:盡我所能幫拜登當(dāng)選
2020-07-29 15:01 美國大選2020 -
澳外長訪美,態(tài)度突然曖昧:無意傷害與中國的重要關(guān)系
2020-07-29 14:00 -
美疾控主任:對歐洲旅行禁令遲緩是美疫情暴發(fā)主要因素
2020-07-29 11:50 美國一夢 -
香港“劇變”有利新加坡?李顯龍這樣答
2020-07-29 11:30 -
盡管沒派上用場,共和黨仍提議用抗疫預(yù)算造4艘醫(yī)院船
2020-07-29 11:28 新冠肺炎抗疫戰(zhàn) -
烏克蘭將對中國游客實行免簽制度
2020-07-29 11:28 -
美多州居民收到“神秘中國種子包裹”,咋回事?
2020-07-29 11:19 美國一夢 -
“美國不會和中國打冷戰(zhàn),即使打也贏不了”
2020-07-29 11:11 中美關(guān)系 -
-
我駐歐盟使團:堅決反對,嚴(yán)正交涉
2020-07-29 07:34 中國外交
相關(guān)推薦 -
印度稱“不想升級”,巴方想“就此打住” 評論 264“跟巴西建這條鐵路,中國非常感興趣” 評論 78真急了!“請求中國取消限制” 評論 498歐盟多國大停電,“我們需要中國技術(shù)” 評論 183最新聞 Hot
-
印度稱“不想升級”,巴方想“就此打住”
-
英法德波領(lǐng)導(dǎo)人訪問基輔,將與澤連斯基共同討論?;饐栴}
-
印軍否認(rèn)S-400防空系統(tǒng)被摧毀
-
印度前高官:勸巴基斯坦,中國的話好使
-
空中爆炸!巴軍通報7日空戰(zhàn)細(xì)節(jié),含擊落“陣風(fēng)”錄音
-
要松口了?印官員稱將“適時”公開
-
印度32座機場暫停對所有民用航班運營
-
英官員承認(rèn):美英貿(mào)易協(xié)議這條款,沖中國來的
-
巴外長:印度讓巴基斯坦別無選擇
-
巴基斯坦稱使用“梟龍”戰(zhàn)機擊毀印度S-400防空系統(tǒng)
-
搞錢色交易、貪欲膨脹,深圳市政協(xié)原副主席王幼鵬被“雙開”
-
“跟巴西建這條鐵路,中國非常感興趣”
-
果然,英國被用來“立規(guī)矩”了
-
印度官員:印軍正做出回應(yīng)
-
印方:一高級官員在巴方炮擊中身亡
-
巴基斯坦發(fā)起“銅墻鐵壁”行動:已打擊20多處印度軍事設(shè)施
-