-
羅思義:“民主峰會”是一場地緣政治攻擊,但中國不用擔心
最后更新: 2021-12-09 09:32:55In the theory of liberal democracy the world is “standing on its head”
In summary, in the theory of liberal democracy everything is “standing on it head”. The least important, a formal and in reality non-existent equality, is declared to be the most important while the “earthly life” is declared to be less important – precisely as the difference in real life conditions between a Chinese woman and an Indian woman. Or, in Marx’s analysis, the difference between the formal equality of Jews in Germany and their real life.
Socialism, and China, puts everything the right way up. It says that it is the most fundamental that a Chinese women should live 8 years longer, that she should be literate, that she should have a hugely lower risk of dying in childbirth. And then China and socialism starts from what system actually delivers this improvement in the real life of human beings. That is its conception of “rule by the people” and “human rights” is strictly practical.
China extends the same principle as applies to Chinese women to all aspects of society.
China has lifted 850 million people out of internationally defined poverty – that is more than 70% of all those who have been lifted out of poverty in the world.
China has raised itself from almost the world’s poorest country in 1949 to “moderate prosperity” by its national standards and to within two to three years of being a “high income” economy by World Bank standards.
China has produced in the “earthly life” of real human beings, the greatest improvement in the conditions of life of the greatest number of people in human history.
That is, China has a political system which is determined by real results, that is improvement in the real lives of people, not by formal processes.
Because it is a socialist country, China’s economy can be brought under “rule by the people” – which is excluded by the capitalist system of rule of the economy by private property.
Naturally the specific political form, which is secondary in the framework above, is determined by China’s history. As Xi Jinping put it, the person wearing the shoe knows whether it fits or not. China’s present political system based on the leading role of the CPC, with other political parties in alliance with the overall lead of the CPC, is specific to China. It does not propose it for any other country.
But what China has defined is the real improvement of the real conditions of humanity. That is the real improvement of the “rule by the people”. That is what has been demonstrated by China’s history and real social and political development.
The farce of the so called “democracy summit”
Finally, so far, the analysis has been made of the false analysis of liberal democracy within the framework of the nation state. But, of course, the same analysis applies to international issues – showing even more clearly the farce of the claim that Biden has called on 9-10 December a ludicrously misnamed ‘Summit for Democracy’. On the contrary, in the international sphere, this is a meeting led by the most anti-democratic countries in the world.
Numerous facts show that US administrations have a record of systematic violations of democracy in the international sphere. No other country approaches the US in a record of invasion of other states, support of anti-democratic coups, and other forms of aggression against countries etc. It is sufficient to mention only the invasion of Iraq, the bombing of Libya, the coup against Allende, the decades long economic embargo against Cuba in defiance of almost unanimous votes in the UN, to see that the claim by the US that its policies are motivated by “democracy” is quite false.
In reality these facts show that the only basis on which US administrations act is support for countries which subordinate themselves to the US, including those that have no form of democracy whatever such as Saudi Arabia. US aggression is carried out against countries which stand up for their national interests against the US whatever their form of government. Thus, even countries which fully confirm to the (false) Western liberal concepts of democracy are excluded from the summit – such as Bolivia and Nicaragua.
The facts show that key countries joining this meeting have long histories of colonialism and were participants in anti-democratic actions outside international law and the framework of the United Nations such as the invasion of Iraq. As with the analysis of the real situation of women in China and India, or Marx’s analysis of the position of Jews in Germany, the ideological claims of the US on “human rights” and “democracy” are to conceal the reality that the US, and its key allies, are the greatest practical international violators of the real rights of countries and peoples.
In short, no credibility can be given the claim that the purpose of this meeting is about “democracy”. It is instead about attempts by the US administration to draw false lines of divide to attempt to conceal its real policies.
Conclusion
China’s gigantic achievements since 1949 in improving the real lives of its people, the greatest in human history in such a time frame, exactly correspond to the improvement in the “earthly life”, that is the real life, of human beings, as opposed to their non-existent “heavenly life” – that is the false ideological claims of liberal capitalist democracy. That is why China will win in a real international discussion on human rights and democracy. But to do so its media, both international and domestic, must not allow itself to be confused by and make concessions to fake Western liberal democratic concepts. It can be guided by one of the greatest examples of genius in human history – Marx’s demolition of the myths of liberal democracy and why, therefore, he became a socialist. This is not merely an historical tribute, it is the best way to deal with the current ideological offensives of the US against the Chinese people and against the real interests of humanity.
本文系觀察者網獨家稿件,文章內容純屬作者個人觀點,不代表平臺觀點,未經授權,不得轉載,否則將追究法律責任。關注觀察者網微信guanchacn,每日閱讀趣味文章。
-
本文僅代表作者個人觀點。
- 責任編輯: 戴蘇越 
-
升破6.35關口,人民幣匯率創(chuàng)三年半新高
2021-12-09 08:46 觀網財經-金融 -
寧波上海廣州等港口提價,海運費“高燒”或延續(xù)兩三年
2021-12-09 07:23 觀網財經-宏觀 -
蜜雪冰城起訴抖音網絡侵權
2021-12-08 19:38 -
二次上市首日破發(fā),缺少新故事的微博出路在哪
2021-12-08 19:34 觀網財經-互聯(lián)網 -
王毅接待多國外長,為何選在湖州?
2021-12-08 16:38 綠水青山就是金山銀山 -
美國安顧問揚言阻止“武統(tǒng)”,中方回應
2021-12-08 16:22 -
《金融時報》說中國危險,但全球投資者用腳投票
2021-12-08 15:41 觀網財經-宏觀 -
“圣誕節(jié)前噩夢”,iPhone十年來首次停產
2021-12-08 15:14 觀網財經-科創(chuàng) -
央視網:文峰“彩虹屁”現(xiàn)象易演化為職場PUA
2021-12-08 10:03 觀網財經-評論 -
賣出點成買入,億緯鋰能實控人減持時真的“誤操作”?
2021-12-08 09:50 觀網財經-科創(chuàng) -
政治局會議首提“促進房地產業(yè)健康發(fā)展和良性循環(huán)”,如何實現(xiàn)?
2021-12-08 09:29 觀網財經-房產 -
研究:“偉哥”或可防治阿爾茨海默病
2021-12-08 09:24 觀網財經-健康 -
經濟日報:即便面對經濟下行壓力,“房住不炒”也沒有動搖
2021-12-08 09:07 觀網財經-房產 -
韓國最大規(guī)模IPO!寧德時代勁敵LG新能源擬募資百億美元
2021-12-08 08:42 觀網財經-金融 -
面簽3天后放款,樓市調控有新動向?
2021-12-08 08:15 觀網財經-房產 -
“美國不需要拜登政府的1.7萬億美元法案”
2021-12-07 22:51 -
無需供體角膜,人工角膜產品獲批上市
2021-12-07 21:30 醫(yī)學 -
“中國經濟增長不僅有利于中國,也有利于世界”
2021-12-07 20:28 觀網財經-宏觀 -
網傳裁員30%,快手外戰(zhàn)內戰(zhàn)雙雙不利
2021-12-07 20:19 -
8核芯片變4核,歐拉能否用“7200元權益包”挽回信任?
2021-12-07 20:16 觀網財經-汽車
相關推薦 -
卡塔爾送大禮引爭議,特朗普:免費的也罵? 評論 138何立峰:中美達成重要共識 評論 296“中國猛龍首露利爪,實戰(zhàn)證明自身價值” 評論 249印巴的“火”停了,但水呢? 評論 121最新聞 Hot
-
卡塔爾送大禮引爭議,特朗普:免費的也罵?
-
美國小企業(yè)苦苦掙扎:利潤蒸發(fā)甚至變?yōu)樨摂?,最糟的時刻還未到來
-
特朗普施壓后,澤連斯基表態(tài):我去土耳其等普京
-
日車企利潤暴跌超20%,“與中國競爭加劇”
-
中美會談結束后,美國股指期貨應聲上漲
-
“特朗普夜不能寐,搞定全球問題比想象難得多”
-
靠岸中國貨船數“歸零”,美西港口官員驚到了
-
“出軌女下屬”,英國海軍一把手被免職
-
“聽加州的,否則美國最大經濟體地位不保”
-
流浪53年后,蘇聯(lián)金星探測器墜落地球
-
伊朗官員:美國不真誠,一開始就設陷阱
-
?;鸬谝灰?,印巴互相指責
-
為什么選出美國籍教皇?梵蒂岡消息人士:還不是因為特朗普
-
普京提議:15日,俄烏直接談
-
王毅分別同印巴雙方通話
-
印度稱“不想升級”,巴方想“就此打住”
-